It is widely seen that shops should be forbidden to sell food and drinks that
pose harm to physical health from a scientific perspective. With this, I totally agree.
In the first place, the restriction of harmful food and drinks will yield some beneficial
results to both consumers and even vendors. Primarily, it is undeniable that such an
action will improve public health by limiting exposure to harmful chemicals often
found in processed foods and beverages. Specifically, currently, people rely on
fast foods and takeaways, which contain excessive chemical additives, instead
of preparing fresh meals. Moreover, prohibiting harmful substances in foods and
drinks will also benefit the retailers. This is because selling healthy and harmless
products can greatly decrease the risk of legal disputes and penalties, as vendors
are accountable for the safety and quality of their products.
In the second place, restraining such foods and drinks is essential for maintaining
public safety and ensuring regulatory system. Firstly, food safety is the core of
social welfare, allowing all residents to live a stable and high-quality life.
For instance, people will have to face health crises, such as get chronic
diseases and food poisoning, if they regularly consume unsafe food products.
Second, the law of food safety is also an important part of the regulation design.
Every authority or government is responsible for their citizens by implementing
associated food safety regulations.
In conclusion, I entirely support the idea of banning harmful food and drinks,
as it benefits not only consumers but also businesses and society as a whole.
By improving public health, reducing legal risks for vendors, and strengthening
food safety regulations, such measures are essential for building a healthier and
more sustainable future.